subscribe to our newsletter

Failure to pay minimum pension ‘diabolical’ for reversionary pensions

Aaron Dunn
Miranda Brownlee
17 June 2019 — 1 minute read

With 30 June fast approaching, SMSF professionals and their clients have been reminded on the importance of paying the minimum pension amount, especially for reversionary pensions.

In a recent SMSF Adviser webcast, BGL Corporate Solutions product manager Anthony Fernandez said one of the main things that SMSF professionals and their clients need to watch out for in the lead-up to the end of the financial year is ensuring the minimum pension amount has been paid.

Mr Fernandez said this can sometimes be a problem where the fund has not been finalised properly from the year before, as it means the minimum amounts for the current year may have been calculated incorrectly.


“Also, if the member has jumped from 74 to 75, for example, there’s going to be an increase in the percentage that needs to be drawn down, which they need to bear in mind,” he added.

“That increase in the pension percentage is something you need to plan for, because you need to ensure you have the liquidity in the fund to be able to take that money out.”

Speaking in the same webcast, Smarter SMSF chief executive Aaron Dunn stressed that the failure to withdraw the minimum where it’s a reversionary pension is particularly problematic.

“Failure to take the minimum pension on a reversionary pension is a diabolical outcome because, if you can’t take a pension, then you are forced to take a lump sum. So, it’s absolutely critical,” he cautioned.

Given the transfer balance account reporting requirements, Mr Dunn said the timeliness of when pensions are started is also important now.

“An accountant might say, well, the optimum tax position is to go back and say that there was an oral decision or a request to say that it was done on 1 July, but if we’re in April or May, well, that actually needed to be reported by 28 October,” he explained.

“So, there’s actually a strategic decision that needs to be made around the timeliness of when that pension starts, so it might not be that we’re trying to max out the tax effect of that particular year.”

Mr Dunn also reminded SMSF practitioners that the ATO has updated its market valuation guidelines on its website in respect to how it deals with events.

“You don’t actually need the account balance at the time if you use fair and reasoned process to deal with that,” he said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Failure to pay minimum pension ‘diabolical’ for reversionary pensions
aaron dunn smsf 3
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.