X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Federal Court disqualifies officers over failed land banking scheme

The Federal Court of Australia has disqualified two officers involved in a land banking scheme that targeted both retail and SMSF investors.

by Miranda Brownlee
February 6, 2019
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Michael Grochowski and Ian Stephens have been disqualified from managing corporations for five and a half years and four years respectively by the Federal Court of Australia.

Both were officers of companies that had failed and been wound up by the Court.

X

Mr Grochowski was an officer of Bilkurra Investments Pty Ltd and Foscari Holdings Pty Ltd, now both in liquidation, before they were wound up by the Court.

In a public release, ASIC stated that Bilkurra Investments and Foscari Holdings operated land banking schemes in Victoria, known as Hermitage Bendigo and Foscari. Promoters of the land banking schemes used Bilkurra and Foscari to raise approximately $24 million from investors.

In July last year, the Federal Court made orders winding up five companies involved with Hermitage Bendigo and another land banking scheme called Veneziane.

Four of the companies entered into contracts for the purchase of land for rezoning and were involved in the promotion of the schemes and received money from investors.

ASIC sought orders as it was concerned that the companies were insolvent and that money raised from investors [of] more than $15 million had been transferred between companies without any apparent concern for obligations owed to investors, and that the majority of funds raised from investors had been dissipated.

Some of the investors involved in the scheme were SMSFs, as previously confirmed by ASIC.

In deciding the period of banning, the court considered an earlier decision of a delegate of ASIC, made in April 2012, prohibiting Grochowski from providing financial services for four years.

The Court was also satisfied with ASIC’s claim that the way both companies were managed was the reason for their failing.

It also found that the appointment of Stephens as a director of both companies, who was an experienced chartered accountant, presented a false facade of meaningful oversight and governance of the companies’ affairs.

Further, the Court found Mr Stephens failed to exercise any meaningful decision making and management responsibility for the companies, which had obtained large amounts of investment from the public.

ASIC commissioner John Price said these bannings will help protect the public from further investing with officers of companies that repeatedly fail.

“ASIC will continue to investigate failed land banking schemes and take whatever action is necessary to ensure failed schemes do not continue.”

Tags: News

Related Posts

Move assets before death to avoid tax implications: SMSF legal specialist

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Mitigating the impact of death benefit tax can be supported by ensuring the SMSF deed allows for the transfer of...

Investment rules can decide if crypto is a safe call

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Before investing in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, SMSF trustees have to consider whether it complies with the SMSF investment rules, a...

Impact of EOY shutdown on new SMSF registrants

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

The ATO has warned trustees that its end-of-year shutdowns may cause delays for new SMSF new registrants.

Comments 4

  1. Cheryl says:
    7 years ago

    Does anyone know of a class action for investors seeking money back from the failed Hermitage Development?

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    7 years ago

    Does anyone know of a class action for investors seeking money back from Veneziano Development?

    Reply
    • Anonymous says:
      4 years ago

      Have you heard of any updates regarding this? I am in the same situation.

      Reply
  3. Anonymous says:
    7 years ago

    More SMSF auditors heading to court for failing to identify dodgy investments? Many more qualified audits coming where unlisted investments are involved.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited