X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

CA ANZ hits out at ‘unnecessary licensing restrictions’

Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand has criticised the current regulatory and licensing regime as unworkable and has urged the government to consider reducing some of the restrictions facing accountants in a response to the royal commission.

by Miranda Brownlee
November 8, 2018
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In its submission to the interim report of the royal commission, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) stated that it is in the public interest to attract and retain more accountants in the financial advice industry.

The submission said that many accountants are frustrated that professional accountants have been discouraged from providing financial advice to their clients due to regulatory and licensing restrictions.

X

“While this may sound counter-intuitive, consideration should be given to reducing or at least streamlining unnecessary regulatory and licensing restrictions and recognising the hard work that is required to gain and maintain membership of Chartered Accountants, including degree and post graduate studies, three years of mentoring, strict adherence to our Code of Ethics and ongoing CPD,” CA ANZ said in the submission.

“There is widespread agreement amongst Chartered Accountants that the current regulatory and licensing regime is not working, and there is concern that more regulation will hinder their ongoing ability to be the community’s foundation stone for sound advice.”

The submission also noted that 66 per cent of accountants in practice (in a survey conducted by CA ANZ in May this year) said they would likely stop providing advice if FASEA’s proposed education reforms were passed in their current form.

“It is in the public interest to attract and retain more accountants in the financial advice industry by reducing unnecessary regulatory barriers,” it stated.

Tags: News

Related Posts

Move assets before death to avoid tax implications: SMSF legal specialist

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Mitigating the impact of death benefit tax can be supported by ensuring the SMSF deed allows for the transfer of...

Investment rules can decide if crypto is a safe call

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Before investing in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, SMSF trustees have to consider whether it complies with the SMSF investment rules, a...

Impact of EOY shutdown on new SMSF registrants

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

The ATO has warned trustees that its end-of-year shutdowns may cause delays for new SMSF new registrants.

Comments 4

  1. Charles says:
    7 years ago

    Agreed

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    7 years ago

    Couldn’t agree more!

    Reply
  3. Professional Adviser says:
    7 years ago

    Well said. This way the consumer knows all those authorised to provide them financial advice have all met the same minimun education standard.

    Reply
  4. Anonymous says:
    7 years ago

    What ever version of FASEA passes, it MUST apply to All involved.

    Given every part of the Financial System has had issues and let the system down, especially the CEO’s and Government bodies, these people must be made to jump through the same hoops as the lowly Financial Advisers.

    FASEA for ALL involved !!!!!!
    FASEA for ALL involved in any part of Financial Services !!!!!
    ASIC, APRA, ATO, etc CEO’s, Executives & Managers making these rules must have passed them.
    All Politicians must do FASEA, especially the ETHICS.
    All Bank CEO’s, Executives & Managers must do FASEA.
    All Life Insurance Co. CEO’s, Executives & Managers must do FASEA.
    All Super Fund Trustees, CEO’s, Executives & Managers must do FASEA.
    All Financial Associations, FPA, FSC, AFA, SMSFA, etc CEO’s, Executives & Managers must do FASEA.
    And lets not forget the FASEA CEO’s, Executives & Managers must do FASEA, surely these people need to have passed the qualifications to be forcing them on Advisers.

    Regards
    Adam Passwell

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited