subscribe to our newsletter
Accountants question CPD value in new industry poll

Accountants question CPD value in new industry poll

accountant, question mark
Jotham Lian
31 August 2018

About half of accountants surveyed in an industry poll don't believe the CPD avenues offered by their professional association are meeting their needs. 

In poll conducted by sister publication Accountants Daily about the value of education provided by professional associations, 44.4 per cent of the 839 respondents said that they did not get value from their professional body’s education services, and only did so because it was mandatory. A further 29.9 per cent said stating that it was not fit for purpose.

Just over one in 10 respondents said that their association’s CPD was fit for purpose, while 13 per cent said they would participate even if CPD was not mandated.

Prime Partners director James Carey said the results were hardly surprising, given his firm members' experience with some of the professional bodies.

“I am not surprised by that because as a member of CA ANZ, I haven't found their internal training that they offer to members to be as useful as other CPD providers that me and my team use,” said Mr Carey.

Instead, Mr Carey said his firm regularly looks outside of associations for both technical and soft skill training.

“We use the Knowledge Shop for a lot of our technical training and we've used the NTAA, that sort of training really seems to be geared a lot more towards your smaller and medium-sized firms and is very practical and useful,” he added.

“We also use third-party providers for our soft skills training. We've had business writing courses, presentation skills, even practice management and sales training, but we haven't necessarily found something equivalent from associations.

“I think that it would be worthwhile for associations to be asking members what they want. They definitely provide a lot of training and there are a lot of resources because they have a broad church to cover but it doesn't seem to be a stream towards the smaller firms.”

Accodex chief executive Chris Hooper said that while he could understand where most of the respondents were coming from, he believes the accounting profession is already on the right path of bringing education in line with the commercial realities of the profession.

However, Mr Hooper also added that a move towards the Chartered Global Management Accountant (CGMA) competency framework would be beneficial to the Australian accounting education discussion.

The CGMA competency framework consists of four main skills – namely, technical skills, business skills, leadership skills, and people skills.

“At the end of the day, CPD is an obligation for accountants and practices,” said Mr Hooper.

"Our team at Accodex get much more value from the soft skills training, and I think it makes for more well-rounded accountants. It's encouraging to see a lot of the professional bodies and even software vendors are offering more of this content.”

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Accountants question CPD value in new industry poll
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What do you plan to do in response to the new adviser education standards?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super