subscribe to our newsletter

Lawyer warns on ‘botched’ changes of trustee

Miranda Brownlee
05 January 2018 — 1 minute read

Changes of trustee that have been incorrectly drafted may be more widespread than what public information reveals and can result in delays and costs for clients, an industry lawyer cautions.

DBA Lawyers senior associate David Oon said while it may seem easy to put together a document that simply states that one trustee resigns and one trustee is appointed, it can actually be difficult given that there is no standardised method for changing a trustee.

“The method to be followed depends on the specific rules of the current deed of the SMSF,” explained Mr Oon.


The deed, for example, may require the change of trustee power to be exercised by a specific entity such as the existing trustee, members, founder of the SMSF or principal employer, he explained.

The deed may also state that the change of the trustee cannot occur without the consent of a specific entity, or the appointment of a new trustee must be done by deed rather than just by resolution or that the appointment can only occur if the requisite notice period is given.

“Several real examples exist where SMSF changes of trustee were botched or nearly botched, and even made it to court,” Mr Oon said.

The case of Moss Super Pty Ltd v Hayne [2008] VSC 158 is one example where the change of trustee completely failed.

The case involved a purported change of trustee where a member signed a document removing one company as trustee and appointing another.

“Unfortunately, the SMSF’s deed at the time said that the founder had the power to change the trustee, not the member,” Mr Oon said.

“The member who signed the document was actually one of two directors of the founder. However, this was not enough and the change of trustee was held to have completely failed.”

This led to an unusual situation of the judge declaring that the SMSF did not actually have a trustee at all, because the old trustee had validly resigned but the new trustee had not been validly appointed, he said.

“Since taking a case to court is inevitably expensive, the cases in the public domain suggest that more instances of failed changes of trustee exist where the matter was settled  without litigation and therefore without becoming public knowledge,” Mr Oon said.

“Given that the trustee holds the purse strings for an SMSF, it is critically important to get SMSF changes of trustee correct. A wrong move giving rise to delays and costs can have devastating consequences, especially for succession planning.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Lawyer warns on ‘botched’ changes of trustee
banned signage
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.