Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

ATO pushed on low balance carve outs from TBAR

Calculator and data
Miranda Brownlee
05 October 2017 — 2 minute read

One of the accounting bodies is lobbying for SMSFs with modest balances to be excluded from the events-based reporting requirements, fearing that it will impose “significant compliance costs on the entire pension phase population”.

In a submission responding to the ATO’s position paper on events-based reporting, the Institute of Public Accountants (IPA) said the ATO should consider adopting a risk approach to limit the compliance impact of the TBAR regime.

“Applying the regime to members that are more likely to exceed their transfer balance limit seems to be a better approach to take as it achieves the desired outcomes without imposing significant compliance cost on the entire pension phase population,” the submission said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

While the IPA acknowledged that the TBAR regime is a vital mechanism for the ATO to minimise the taxation consequences where the transfer balance cap is exceeded, it expressed concerns that whole-of-industry reporting may not be the best approach.

“The discussion paper takes a whole-of-industry reporting approach in the position paper. Whilst we fully understand the ATO has an obligation to monitor the $1.6 million cap, it is imposing additional compliance cost on all trustees regardless of whether the cap has application,” said the submission.

“For trustees with a relatively modest superannuation interest it will be highly unlikely that they are ever going to get anywhere near the $1.6 million cap. Regardless of the superannuation interest, the position paper still wants these members to report.”

The Institute of Public Accountants said the ATO is in a position to be able to determine fund members who may have or may end up with a superannuation interest of $1.6 million without having every member in the country report.

“This whole-of-industry reporting adds substantial cost to fund members in pension mode for no [to] little benefit to anyone,” said the submission.

“Already intermediaries are proposing to charge trustees in pension mode more for SMSF administration services to undertake these additional compliance requirements on behalf of trustees.”

The IPA questioned whether the cost of the TBAR regime being applied to all members in pension phase will outweigh the benefits.

“Applying the regime to members that are more likely to exceed their transfer balance limit seems to be a better approach to take as it achieves the desired outcomes without imposing significant compliance cost on the entire pension phase population,” said the submission.

“Members with smaller balances will incur additional costs which reduces their retirement benefits unnecessarily.”

The submission also stated that there was “no reason why some events should be reported 10 days after the end of the month and others 28 days after the end of a quarter”.

“All reporting should be 28 days after the end of each quarter - irrespective of the event,” said the IPA submission.

“To report a pension commutation, as an example, requires the same amount or more administration work and asset valuations as starting a new pension - so why should the reporting dates be different?”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ATO pushed on low balance carve outs from TBAR
calculator
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.