subscribe to our newsletter

ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting

Question mark, ATO, unknowns, LRBA reporting
Miranda Brownlee
22 September 2017 — 1 minute read

The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requirements set to create “difficulties and complications”.

In June this year the government passed legislation requiring repayments made for an LRBA from a member’s accumulation account that result in an increase in the value of that member’s retirement-phase account to be counted as a credit for transfer balance account purposes.

The SMSF Academy’s Aaron Dunn explained that if the repayment is sourced from assets that support the same superannuation interest that won’t increase the value of the interest, then the SMSF trustee will not be required to report this as a transfer balance credit.


“This is because the reduction in the LRBA liability is being offset by a corresponding reduction in cash so we don’t need to report that amount as a transfer balance credit. It’s being generated by income from the asset that is under the LRBA,” he said.

However, if it’s being sourced from other assets such as contributions or accumulation interests from inside the fund, he said, then there’s no offset in the value of those retirement phase interests so therefore the overall value is going to increase by the amount of the repayment and it will need to be reported as a credit.

The government, he explained, has introduced this credit to take into account the shift that occurs from accumulation across to pension by virtue of a specific repayment.

“This in itself is going to create a lot of difficulties and complications. Once we start to incorporate tax exemptions, we’ll need to look at expenses and how they’re attributed. There are a lot of unknowns around this at this time,” said Mr Dunn.

“I would expect to see the ATO provide some further clarity in respect to this over the coming year, as we move into the events based reporting requirements.”

SMSF practitioners with clients setting up LRBAs from 1 July 2017, he said, will need to closely monitor the issue in the meantime.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
confusion question 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.