Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

SISFA lobbies against performance benchmarking for SMSFs

Performance, balance
Miranda Brownlee
01 September 2017 — 1 minute read

The Self-managed Independent Superannuation Funds Association has stressed in a submission to the Productivity Commission that investment performance benchmarking is not a reliable indicator of performance for SMSFs.

In a submission to stage three of the Productivity Commission’s Review of Efficiency and Competitiveness of the Superannuation System, SISFA said when assessing the performance of segments of the superannuation system, the Commission should bear in mind that the performance of SMSFs will vary according to circumstances, risk appetite and expectations of members.

“With regard to the Commission’s intended approach to investment performance benchmarking, we note that comparisons based on average returns may be an appropriate measure of performance for large managed funds, but averages are a less reliable indicator of the performance of self-managed funds,” said the submission.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Each one of the half a million SMSFs is, in a sense, unique because of the differing investment strategies adopted by the trustees, taking into account their knowledge of and access to markets and their appetite for risk which may change as they move through the accumulation and pension cycles.”

The submission also stressed that fund members will have differing perspectives on what they regard as an adequate retirement income.

“So while average performances by SMSFs may be of general interest and of some use in comparing sector performances within the superannuation system, they may mask quite wide variations in individual fund performance based on investment strategies and the circumstances and expectations of their members,” said SISA.

“So we caution against a ‘one size fits all’ approach with regard to measuring and comparing the performance of SMSFs.”

SISFA also stated that it was strongly opposed to any attempt to influence or direct SMSF trustees towards particular asset mixes.

“We believe trustees, with appropriate advice should they choose to seek it, are best placed to judge what is in the best interests of their members who are essentially the same people,” said SISFA.

SISFA stressed in the report that what matters fundamentally is that SMSFs are enabling their members to build sufficient retirement savings to be financially independent in retirement.

“In this regard, SMSFs are the most successful type of fund in terms of asset values at retirement sufficient to generate an adequate retirement income.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SISFA lobbies against performance benchmarking for SMSFs
balance 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.