Commuting a TRIS on 1 July 2017 instead of 30 June could result in an additional technical issue for SMSF clients, according to an industry lawyer.
DBA Lawyers special counsel Bryce Figot said one of the rules that apply to most SMSF pensions is that before commuting pensions, including TRISs, a pro-rated pension minimum must be paid.
Even if the pension was commuted at 12:00:01AM on 1 July, a prorated amount must first be paid, said Mr Figot.
While in practise many SMSF practitioners may disagree, he said the commissioner previously confirmed this in the minutes of the June 2009 meeting of the National Tax Liaison Group; Superannuation Technical Sub-Group.
The commissioner stated that “where the commutation occurs on 1 July … the Tax Office considers that there is one day in the payment period and a minimum pension or annuity payment representing a one day period must be paid”.
“This approach means 1 July would also be counted in working out the minimum payment for any new pension immediately commenced from a rollover of the commutation lump sum,” the commissioner said.
I light of this, Mr Figot said that if a TRIS is commuted on 1 July, a prorated minimum will have to be paid first.
“Accordingly, I suspect that those rolling back a TRIS might wish to do so on 30 June in order to avoid the practical difficulty of having to pay a prorated minimum first,” he said.
Under the current law, if the TRIS assets were segregated current pension assets as at 9 November 2016, a commutation will need to be made before 1 July 2017, anyway, if the assets are to be eligible for CGT relief under s 294 110 of the Income Tax (Transitional Provisions) Act 1997(Cth).
However, he noted that there is currently a bill in Parliament which proposes relaxing this provision so that no commutation is necessary in order to be eligible for segregated CGT relief.
Mr Figot said there are a number of other considerations that need to be made before deciding to commute a TRIS, including whether the lump sum resulting from the commutation will be internally rolled back to accumulation and mixed with other benefits.
“If so, are you comfortable with the implications of taxable component being irrevocably mixed with tax-free component?” he said.
He also stressed the importance of properly documenting any commutation and complying with the specific provisions of the fund’s governing rules.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilities
A lack of understanding around taxable and non-taxable components in super funds could be exposing SMSF clients to unnecessary tax liabiliti...read more
- Contributions triple in June quarter, survey shows
The average contribution amount from SMSF trustees tripled for the June 2017 quarter, with super members looking to maximise their contribut...read more
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- view all