One representative body has called on Treasury to revise the legislation relating to the transfer of benefits from foreign superannuation funds to Australia to mitigate the likely risk of unintended consequences for taxpayers.
In a submission to Treasury, the Tax Institute made a recommendation to implement changes to the application of certain provisions in division 305 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and related legislative provisions.
The Tax Institute said in the submission that in certain circumstances the application of the provisions of sub-division 305-B, particularly the calculation of applicable fund earnings, may result in unfair or unintended consequences for taxpayers and the ATO.
“Furthermore, there are a number of areas where the legislation or its application lack certainty, and clarification by legislative amendment, regulation or taxation rulings should be provided,” it said.
The Tax Institute said in many scenarios, “applying the formula in s305-75, the taxpayer is subject to tax on amounts that would be in excess of the amount that would generally be regarded as earnings accrued in the foreign superannuation fund whilst an Australian tax resident”.
“Conversely, there are scenarios where the taxpayer may be assessable on amounts that would generally be regarded as less than the earnings whilst an Australian tax resident.”
It called on Treasury to simplify the formula for calculating applicable fund earnings and remove barriers to the transfer of benefits that have accrued in foreign superannuation funds that result from contribution caps and funding caps.
It also called for a reduction in restrictions regarding elections that have an amount of “AFE deposited with an Australian superannuation fund included in the assessable income of that fund notwithstanding that it is from a foreign superannuation fund”.
The submission also said that foreign income tax offsets (FITO) should be able to be claimed by an Australian superannuation fund where the individual has elected for the fund to be assessable on the AFE but where the individual suffers personal foreign tax liabilities on that same amount.
“The Tax Institute considers this area of the legislation needs revising to provide better clarity and certainty, and to ensure that the legislation is operating correctly for the benefit of the Australian community,” it said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all