The ambiguities surrounding certain SIS provisions along with poor quality estate planning documents are undermining documents such as binding death benefit nominations, and one industry lawyer believes government intervention is now a necessity.
DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler said the government needs to address some of the confusing and ambiguous clauses in the SIS Act and regulations that are leading to invalid binding death benefit nominations, and look at what can be done to stop the manipulation of BDBNs against the wishes of elderly family members.
Some of these issues relating to BDBNs, Mr Butler said, were a key area of focus in the Elder Abuse (DP 83) discussion paper compiled by the Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) last year.
One of the proposals made by the ALRC paper was that the witnessing requirements for binding death nominations in the SIS Act and regulations be equivalent to those for wills.
The paper also suggested that it should be made clearer in Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth) that a person appointed under an enduring power of attorney cannot make binding death benefit nomination on behalf of a member.
“With elder abuse there’s all sorts of things that are happening, particularly children manipulating their parents and siphoning off their pension and spending their money, but this is a ripe area for elder abuse, the ALRC are aware of these difficulties and uncertainties that undermine most BDBNs,” said Mr Butler.
“We have previously put this forth to government and we haven’t had a warm reception. The government doesn’t seem to have an appetite for it because there’s no tax in it.”
Mr Butler said there is a strong need for the government to review the legislation in this area and further prevent estate planning documents from being prepared by unqualified people.
“It’s causing a disaster, there’s all these people out there, particularly unqualified people, people who are not lawyers, that are doing illegal work,” Mr Butler said.
“Most of the work goes to unqualified people and it’s done very poorly and they’re skating on thin ice because it’s full of ambiguities.”
Elder abuse in relation to BDBNs, he said, often occurs where a child has an enduring power of attorney and overrides the BDBN.
“The real trouble here is that while an EPOA can be a very useful tool, it can be used for you or against you. So if the trusted person that you appoint turns on you, then you’ve got a real problem,” Mr Butler said.
“It’s a hard one, you’ve got to take a policy view on balance - do you trust people more than what you don’t? But it’s something that the government should deal with.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all