The use of the transitional CGT rules which provide concessions to those caught out by the transfer balance cap may not always be in the client’s best interests and should be approached carefully, cautions SuperConcepts.
Speaking at the SMSF Adviser Technical Strategy Day in Sydney, SuperConcepts general manager of technical services and education, Peter Burgess, explained that there are some proposed rules in the draft legislation of the super reforms to provide CGT relief for individuals who are caught by the cap and have to transfer an excess amount back to the accumulation phase.
“Now, you can only apply these CGT concessions if they’ve been used because the client has to transfer an amount back to the accumulation phase or they’ve been impacted by the changes to retirement income streams,” Mr Burgess said.
“So if your client is caught by those changes they will have some CGT relief available to them, but it does require your client to make an irrevocable election in this financial year to claim this CGT relief – an irrevocable election in the 2016-17 financial year.”
Mr Burgess said this involves making an election to reset the cost base of an asset to 30 June 2017.
“So when that [asset] is eventually sold at some point down the track, you can defer paying capital gains on that value until that asset is sold,” he said.
Mr Burgess warned that, in some circumstances, there are assets you wouldn’t want to reset the cost base for.
One example is when a member of the fund decides to go into pension phase and the assets are sold, but they’ve made an irrevocable election in 2016-17 to defer this capital gain and pay that capital gain when that asset is eventually sold.
“They’re now selling it when the fund is 100 per cent in the pension phase, you’ve locked the client into paying a notional capital gain and they’re worse off,” Mr Burgess said.
“So a lot of it depends on what is going to happen in the future. This is the problem with this. You’re asked to make an irrevocable election this financial year without actually knowing what’s going to happen to the fund in the future.”
Mr Burgess said SMSF practitioners need to sit down with their clients and determine how they are going to apply the CGT relief and more importantly whether they’re going to apply the CGT relief.
“We don’t think it’s in everyone’s best interests to always claim the CGT relief.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- 16 Aug 2017SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 15 Aug 2017SMSF auditor disqualified for misconductBy Staff Reporter
- 15 Aug 2017Class gains market share in financial year resultsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tier
Clients hoping to accumulate a superannuation balance of $1.6 million by age 65 will need to start taking full advantage of concessional con...read more
- SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reporting
A straw poll has revealed that the majority of SMSF firms currently feel their firm is not equipped to deal with the proposed events-based r...read more
- view all