Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Warnings issued on traps with CGT transitional rules

Warnings issued on traps with CGT transitional rules

caution
Miranda Brownlee
17 November 2016 — 1 minute read

The use of the transitional CGT rules which provide concessions to those caught out by the transfer balance cap may not always be in the client’s best interests and should be approached carefully, cautions SuperConcepts.

Speaking at the SMSF Adviser Technical Strategy Day in Sydney, SuperConcepts general manager of technical services and education, Peter Burgess, explained that there are some proposed rules in the draft legislation of the super reforms to provide CGT relief for individuals who are caught by the cap and have to transfer an excess amount back to the accumulation phase.

“Now, you can only apply these CGT concessions if they’ve been used because the client has to transfer an amount back to the accumulation phase or they’ve been impacted by the changes to retirement income streams,” Mr Burgess said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“So if your client is caught by those changes they will have some CGT relief available to them, but it does require your client to make an irrevocable election in this financial year to claim this CGT relief – an irrevocable election in the 2016-17 financial year.”

Mr Burgess said this involves making an election to reset the cost base of an asset to 30 June 2017.

“So when that [asset] is eventually sold at some point down the track, you can defer paying capital gains on that value until that asset is sold,” he said.

Mr Burgess warned that, in some circumstances, there are assets you wouldn’t want to reset the cost base for.

One example is when a member of the fund decides to go into pension phase and the assets are sold, but they’ve made an irrevocable election in 2016-17 to defer this capital gain and pay that capital gain when that asset is eventually sold.

“They’re now selling it when the fund is 100 per cent in the pension phase, you’ve locked the client into paying a notional capital gain and they’re worse off,” Mr Burgess said.

“So a lot of it depends on what is going to happen in the future. This is the problem with this. You’re asked to make an irrevocable election this financial year without actually knowing what’s going to happen to the fund in the future.”

Mr Burgess said SMSF practitioners need to sit down with their clients and determine how they are going to apply the CGT relief and more importantly whether they’re going to apply the CGT relief.

“We don’t think it’s in everyone’s best interests to always claim the CGT relief.”

 

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Warnings issued on traps with CGT transitional rules
caution
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.