Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Super reforms to cause compliance mayhem, govt warned

caution
Miranda Brownlee
10 October 2016 — 1 minute read

A trustee lobby group is pushing the government for an extended grace period for its super reforms, saying the introduction of complex super legislation will result in confusion and honest mistakes.

Referring to the superannuation reforms package, tranche two, the SMSF Owners’ Alliance (SMSFOA) says since the legislation introduces “entirely new concepts and procedures”, more time should be allowed to consider how it will work in practice.

It pointed in particular to issues for SMSFs in relation to the practicalities of getting valuations assessed by the necessary deadlines.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The draft legislation anticipates that on or before 1 July 2017, people will know their superannuation balance down to the last dollar,” the SMSFOA said.

“However, for self-managed funds in particular, it can take months for the trustees and the fund’s accountant to assess the value of the assets in the fund, identify the earnings, calculate the tax due and prepare tax returns.

“As there are more than half a million self-managed funds, most with multiple member accounts, we expect there will be a serious compliance logjam in 2017 as fund trustees and their accountants and auditors come to grips with the new requirements.

“We anticipate there will be a lot of confusion and honest mistakes made before the system is bedded down.”

The SMSFOA also argued that the $1.6 million transfer balance cap is “just as retrospective” as the proposed $500,000 non-concessional cap, which has now been withdrawn.

“The tranche two draft legislation is also retrospective, as it catches people who had already moved their superannuation into pension mode, and will require these people to re-engineer their superannuation and pay tax for which they were not previously liable,” the alliance said.

“Had they known this change was coming, they might have made different decisions about when to retire and how to order their financial affairs.

“It is a long-recognised principle of taxation law that it should not be changed with retrospective effect to the disadvantage of those who had abided by the law. The right thing to do would be for the government to ‘grandfather’ the existing rules under which people have saved for their retirement and apply the new measures prospectively.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Super reforms to cause compliance mayhem, govt warned
caution
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.