While the government proposal to allow catch-up concessional contributions has been welcomed, SuperConcepts has identified several flaws with limiting the measure to those with balances of $500,000 or less.
SuperConcepts general manager of technical services and education, Peter Burgess, says he considers the catch-up rules proposed in the budget to be a positive reform, but SuperConcepts is concerned it will only apply to balances of $500,000 or less.
“In our experience whenever you are applying a balance threshold, it can become very complex and is fraught with danger in our view,” Mr Burgess said at an event in Sydney.
He said this is especially true for SMSFs where members may not know their balance at the beginning of the financial year as they may be waiting for valuations and financial statements.
“[For] this measure to be successful, investors need to know what their balance is at the beginning of the financial year so that they can make decisions about whether they are going to make catch-up contributions in that year,” Mr Burgess said.
While the government could try to resolve this issue by basing the threshold on the 30 June balance from two years’ prior so that everyone knows their balance, this would also pose challenges.
“If the government uses that as the balance that has problems as well. What if your balance has subsequently increased above the $500,000? Is it right that you are then able to carry forward those contributions?” he said.
“Conversely what if your balance has reduced below $500,000? Is it right that you’re not able to make those contributions? Whichever way they go, there are problems with it.”
With the current design of the measure, Mr Burgess said the cost will likely outweigh the benefits.
“There may be some alternatives so rather than apply a balance threshold, perhaps capping the amount of concessional contributions that can be carried forward for future years,” he said.
“It’s a positive measure that we’d certainly like to see go ahead, but I have concerns about the $500,000 threshold limit.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all