Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Refunds confusion leading to non-compliance

Refunds confusion leading to non-compliance

Miranda Brownlee
11 January 2016 — 1 minute read

SMSF trustees, in many cases, are still not following the correct ATO procedures for the release of non-concessional excess contributions, resulting in illegal early access in some situations, according to one technical officer.

IOOF technical services manager Julie Steed said one of the areas concerning the release of excess non-concessional contributions in which she continues to see problems is where trustees are arranging the refund of the excess contributions without going through the proper ATO release authority process.

Ms Steed said it is often a case of people identifying the excess when preparing their annual accounts, hearing the law has changed, and then making a withdrawal straight away without the ATO’s release authority.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I think it’s going to be a bit more time before it becomes bedded down, before people have the knowledge that you can’t just refund excess contributions,” she said.

“[SMSF trustees] have to go through the proper process of having the ATO identify they have an excess, [the ATO] sending the trustees and the members the relevant release authorities and members actually acting on those release authorities in accordance with the rules.”

If trustees simply refund the money without waiting for the release authority then that would “technically be illegal early access”, Ms Steed warned.

“So in exactly the same way as if I take money out of the superannuation fund without having met a condition of release, just to pay for anything, this would be in exactly the same boat.”

The second problem Ms Steed said she is seeing among trustees is where they do not understand that there are tight timeframes involved in the process of arranging the release.

“We’re seeing instances where members see quite an official letter from the tax office, and they put that in the 'too hard' basket until they get around to contacting their adviser. So by the time they do that, the timeframe for making their elections has then passed,” she said.

“What they [also] fail to understand is that if they don’t go through the release process, then they may still have an excess contribution, which is then taxed at 47 per cent.”

Read more: 

PwC outlines ‘major’ SMSF growth plans

New ATO guidance ‘provides clarity’ on buy/sell agreements

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Refunds confusion leading to non-compliance
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.