subscribe to our newsletter

Major bank mulls maximum super balance

Miranda Brownlee
23 June 2015 — 1 minute read

Westpac has floated the idea of a “maximum retirement balance ceiling” of $2.5 million whereby any funds exceeding this level are transferred into a separate accumulation fund and taxed at 15 per cent.

In a submission to the government’s tax discussion paper, Westpac said implementing a maximum retirement balance would “reduce distortions and address fairness concerns” and would be simpler to administer than alternative reforms such as a lifetime cap on concessional and non-concessional contributions.

“To the extent that a small number of very large superannuation holdings are adversely affecting the perception of fairness in the superannuation system, we support appropriate changes to address those concerns,” Westpac said in its submission.


“We favour specific, highly targeted measures aimed at curbing any distortions instead of widespread changes to the existing superannuation scheme that impact all members.”

As part of the proposal, Westpac said the $2.5 million cap should not apply to assets used to purchase an eligible longevity product such as annuities.

Westpac argued this will “encourage retirees to protect themselves from longevity risk”.

The current tax settings for the accumulation phase are appropriate, however, and should remain the same, the bank said.

“The embedded concessional tax rate framework is relatively simple to administer and also provides certainty in the context of overall government revenues,” said the submission.

“The Low Income Super Contribution for low income earners and the Division 293 additional tax for high income earners make this arrangement broadly equitable and should be maintained.”

The submission said contributions caps should be reviewed, however, to allow workers who are underfunded for their retirement to make additional voluntary contributions to catch up and improve their adequacy.

Westpac said this would include those with broken work patterns, migrants who have emigrated to Australia part way through their working lives, and workers who have had involuntary periods of non-employment, due to redundancy or ill health, for example.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Major bank mulls maximum super balance
smsf logo
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Are you in favour of abolishing the AFSL system?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.