Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

ATO decision a ‘misguided missile', says lawyer

Miranda Brownlee
22 May 2015 — 1 minute read

An industry lawyer has criticised the ATO’s recent interpretive decision dealing with the use of buy-sell agreements within SMSFs, but has warned SMSF practitioners to take action now.

The ATO provided guidance at the beginning of May examining whether certain buy-sell agreements breach the sole purpose test.

Speaking at a seminar in Sydney, DBA Network director Daniel Butler said in ATO ID 2015/10 the ATO concluded that in purchasing and holding such a policy “the SMSF is not being maintained in accordance with the sole purpose requirements of section 62 of the SISA”.

Mr Butler said what ATO ID 2015/10 does not consider, however, is that the sole purpose test is determined objectively.

“Whether a fund complies with the sole purpose test will depend on the facts of each case and will be assessed by the objective facts, not the subjective views of trustees or, in the case of the corporate trustees, the directors,” said Mr Butler.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Objectively, all the SMSF has done is buy life insurance for a member.”

He also noted that a buy-sell agreement is an “external agreement to which an SMSF is not a party”.

Mr Butler said while he believes the ATO “has missed the point” with this particular interpretive decision, he urged SMSF practitioners to address the decision with their clients.

“My position is that because the ATO says it’s wrong, it would be neglectful of me if I didn’t say, well, you need to jump because the ATO said you’ve got to jump',” he said.

“My advice would be: go to your client, put it in front of them and say this is a misguided missile; things may change, but things don’t generally change quickly with the ATO, so in the meantime you may want to deal with this.”

Mr Butler said it may be difficult for SMSF practitioners to determine which clients are affected by this recent decision.

“You won’t necessarily have the information at your hands to know whether your clients have used their SMSF as an insurance vehicle; you may want to send out a general newsletter to your clients,” he said.

Holding insurance within super was a good thing which the government should be encouraging, Mr Butler said.

“The best thing [SMSF trustees] can have is a decent insurance policy, and what’s the government been trying to do? Squirrel them out of it.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ATO decision a ‘misguided missile', says lawyer
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.