While the draft legislation on excess contributions tax has been largely welcomed by the industry, one industry lawyer has pointed out issues which may not be favourable for SMSF practitioners and their clients.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler said that overall, the exposure draft legislation covering reform of the superannuation excess non-concessional contributions tax represents a positive step for the SMSF sector.
However, he noted there is just seven days for trustees to act on a release authority.
“I think that’s going to be onerous on an SMSF,” Mr Butler said. “What if you want to dispute it? What if there is a difference in your numbers compared to the ATO? What if you don’t have assets that are readily [available?]”
Mr Butler said he would also like to see some “loosening up” of the special consideration concessions, even though they are less likely to be utilised under the new regime.
“If you get stung, you can apply for special circumstances but that discretion is very tight,” Mr Butler said.
“At the moment, there’s no discretion, for instance, for honest mistakes. So you make an honest mistake? Bad luck.”
Although this would rarely apply to SMSFs, Mr Butler said it is worth noting this new entitlement will not be available to those with defined benefit funds.
“When you think about it across the board, particularly for public sector members, they would need to be mindful that if they do exceed their non-concessional contribution limit, they don’t have a right to get the payment out to alleviate their excess non-concessional contribution tax.”
Trustees should also review their deed when the legislation is introduced to reflect the changes and to ensure that it does have the flexibility to do a release, Mr Butler added.
“The deed does need that flexibility. The law does give the flexibility, but the deed also has to give you the flexibility,” he said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 25 Sep 2017Survey results point to major concerns with new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 25 Sep 2017Audit firm reports ‘tsunami’ of CGT errorsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 25 Sep 2017AIST slammed for ‘prejudiced views’ on SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Survey results point to major concerns with new reporting
A recent survey conducted by the SMSF Association reveals that less than half of SMSF practitioners are prepared for events-based reporting,...read more
- view all