Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Property in SMSFs not a looming 'disaster': SMSFOA

Property in SMSFs not a looming 'disaster': SMSFOA

Elyse Perrau
15 April 2014 — 1 minute read

The “noise” about the danger of property in SMSFs is coming from parties that are anti-SMSF, according to the SMSF Owners’ Alliance (SMSFOA).

Speaking at the Morningstar SMSF Trustee Strategy Day in Sydney last week, SMSFOA chairman Bruce Foy said people are led to believe there are “lots of traps” associated with property in SMSFs.

“I think there is a fair bit of noise out there about this issue and it is purely coming from those parties that are anti-SMSF, in my view,” he said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I don’t think there is a disaster waiting to happen, as some people would have you believe, and I think some of the larger APRA-regulated funds and even the industry funds have a vested interest in not losing money to SMSFs,” he added.

“I think property is a terrific asset class and if you can invest, you should.”

However, Oasis Wealth principal Barbara Smith said trustees should be aware of the “complexities” of transferring property from their own name to their SMSF.

“If you bought something in your own hands, you are going to incur capital gains tax and have all the stamp duty hoops to go through, so I don’t think it is worth transferring property out of your own hands and into your super fund,” she said.

Property in SMSFs not a looming 'disaster': SMSFOA
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

When do you plan to undertake the exam under the new adviser education standards?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.