Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Urgent SMSF loan clarification required

Urgent SMSF loan clarification required

Katarina Taurian
15 April 2014 — 1 minute read

Following the issue of a ruling on SMSF borrowing, the ATO needs to clarify its position on related-party loans for SMSFs to ensure trustees are borrowing on an acceptable basis, according to one industry lawyer.

As reported in SMSF Adviser last week, the ATO has issued a private binding ruling which relates to an SMSF borrowing 100 per cent of an asset’s value on an interest free, related-party loan.

“In the circumstances set out in the ruling, they [the ATO] believe the parties were not dealing at arm’s length, and as a result the fund would receive more income than would’ve been the case if they were dealing at arm’s length,” AMP SMSF’s Peter Burgess told SMSF Adviser.

That income is considered to be non-arm’s length income, which means the fund has to pay tax on it at the rate of 45 per cent, he added.

Senior consulting lawyer at SMSF Law Shane Ellis told SMSF Adviser that in light of this private ruling, related-party loans are now at a crossroads.

“This private binding ruling has taken a counter position to a number of previous ATO [private binding rulings],” said Mr Ellis.

“The ATO needs to urgently clarify its position once more as it has clearly stated time and time again in the past that [related party loans] can be more favourable to an SMSF but not more favourable to a related-party lender.”

The SMSF Academy’s managing director Aaron Dunn said this private ruling is a “timely reminder” for SMSF trustees that the regulator will be paying close attention to these transactions moving forward.

“This is a clear realignment in thinking by the Commissioner, giving further regard to the growing number of requests being received,” Mr Dunn said.

An ATO spokesperson told SMSF Adviser that due to confidentiality provisions in the Tax Administration Act, the ATO cannot comment on particular private rulings.

The spokesperson also said private rulings are decided on the particular facts to which they relate.

The ATO warns that private binding rulings should not be used to predict ATO policy or decisions.

Urgent SMSF loan clarification required
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do you think the government should reinstate the accountants’ exemption for SMSF advice?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super