subscribe to our newsletter
SMSFs under $1m not cost effective

SMSFs under $1m not cost effective

Reporter
23 January 2013

SMSFs are “astronomically expensive” and inefficient for funds with under $200,000, according to an superannuation industry consultant.

SMSFs under $1m not cost effective
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What do you plan to do in response to the new adviser education standards?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super