Count Financial has responded to ASIC’s push to increase disclosure requirements for SMSF practitioners, saying the proposed measures may not address individuals who are “in need” of increased information.
In its submission to Consultation Paper 216, Advice on SMSFs: Specific disclosure requirements and SMSF costs (CP 216), Count stated it is concerned the proposed measures will mean that only the advised segment of the market will receive some of the “important information” identified by ASIC.
“Arguably, it is those unadvised individuals that are more in need of the information than those who are advised,” Count stated.
“Individuals who open an SMSF following the receipts of financial advice will generally be much better informed (even under current disclosure requirements) than those who have established an SMSF without receiving advice.”
Count suggested collaboration between the ATO and ASIC for consistency in the information received by trustees.
“We would suggest that the achievement of ASIC’s consumer protection objectives in this area may be enhanced by also working with the ATO to ensure gaps in the current disclosure regime are incorporated into the trustee declaration and key messages document,” Count stated.
“This will ensure that all trustee have access to the same information regarding the risks and obligations associated with SMSFs, including aspects such as the need to be aware of the costs and time involved in running an SMSF, additional considerations in determining appropriate investment and insurance strategies, and consideration of a wind-up strategy.”
Count also stated it is supportive of ASIC’s objectives to improve consumers’ understanding of the “risks and obligations” associated with SMSFs and is “broadly comfortable” with the proposals in CP 216.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 29 May 2017Lawyer warns on ‘practical difficulty’ with TRIS commutationsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 29 May 2017Medicare levy rise spurs estate planning considerationsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 29 May 2017CFS highlights flaw in housing super saver schemeBy Miranda Brownlee
- 26 May 2017Merged association poised to shake up member servicesBy Katarina Taurian
- 26 May 2017Positive exclusion as LRBA amendments introduced to ParliamentBy Miranda Brownlee
- 26 May 2017Midwinter releases superannuation calculatorsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Lawyer warns on ‘practical difficulty’ with TRIS commutations
Commuting a TRIS on 1 July 2017 instead of 30 June could result in an additional technical issue for SMSF clients, according to an industry ...read more
- Medicare levy rise spurs estate planning considerations
In light of the Medicare increase, SMSF practitioners may want to consider whether clients should direct their superannuation benefits to th...read more
- Merged association poised to shake up member services
Under the united banner of SISFA, two newly merged representative bodies are looking to provide “unique” member benefits, including faci...read more
- view all