subscribe to our newsletter

APRA should regulate SMSFs, says analyst

Katarina Taurian
21 November 2013 — 1 minute read

APRA is better suited to regulate SMSFs than the ATO, according to a financial services analyst.

The ATO is not adequately set up to manage SMSFs and ensure their continuing compliance, Wealth Within chief analyst Dale Gillham said.

“The ATO is not built for that purpose. SMSFs are the fastest growing sector of the market. How are they going to keep up with that? They’re not,” Mr Gillham said.


“APRA is already designed to [regulate] anyway,” he added. “To me, it’s just a natural fit that they should be doing it rather than the ATO, which is supposed to be looking after tax.”

Mr Gillham also said education for prospective SMSF trustees should be compulsory, to ensure suitability of the fund for their circumstances.

“When you [see] at least half of the investments in SMSFs on average are in shares, that says to me that people need to be educated,” he said.

Increased interest in limited recourse borrowing arrangements and property investment within SMSFs also heightens the need for mandatory trustee education, Mr Gillham added.

“Now that property has become bigger in terms of buying for SMSFs, [education] has become more critical, because that’s a huge mistake if you get that wrong.”

APRA should regulate SMSFs, says analyst
smsf logo
smsfadviser logo

Become a pro at SMSF fundamentals and make your clients bulletproof with the SMSF Foundations course. Earn up to 21 CPD hours, and learn directly from Aaron Dunn from Smarter SMSF as he deep-dives into the fundamentals you need to know to successfully undertake your work as an SMSF practitioner. Learn more

join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.