Practitioners reject minimum balance requirement for SMSFs

Practitioners reject minimum balance requirement for SMSFs

A majority of respondents to an SMSF Adviser straw poll have indicated there should be no minimum balance requirement for establishing a self-managed fund.

In response to the question, ‘Should there be a minimum balance requirement for establishing an SMSF?’ 53.9 per cent of the 336 respondents answered, ‘No, it should be assessed case by case’.

A further 28.9 per cent of voters answered, ‘Yes, it should be $250,000 or more’, while 6.3 per cent said the minimum should be $100,000. Six per cent said the minimum should be $200,000, and 5.1 per cent said the minimum should be $150,000.

Matthew Jones, owner of Capital 19 Global Investments, told SMSF Adviser that justifying the establishment of an SMSF cannot be limited to balance considerations alone.

“Just because you’ve got a certain amount of money that doesn’t mean that an SMSF is suitable for you. I see a lot of people that shouldn’t have one,” Mr Jones said.

“It’s a personal choice and I’d be reluctant to put a dollar figure on it, because I think the other factors are a lot more important.”

One respondent to the survey, John Williams, said establishing an SMSF should be a mutual decision made by clients and their adviser.

“Prescriptive values are meaningless,” he added.

Practitioners reject minimum balance requirement for SMSFs
smsfadviser logo
promoted stories

SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Strategy