Property needs to be seen as an investment class asset to ensure self-managed super fund (SMSF) trustees are receiving adequate advice.
Following the release of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) taskforce into SMSF advice last week noting property spruiking activities in the sector, Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) chair Ben Kingsley said activity was the result of the area not being regulated as an asset class.
"It's this area that continues to remain a problem child, which is that property investment is not an investment class asset," Mr Kingsley said.
"By not having it regulated, real estate agents, developers and people who are active in this space can get very motivated by the opportunities that trustees have in investment in residential property."
Mr Kingsley said that as the boom in the SMSF sector continues, ASIC will start to increase regulation and guidance within the industry.
"I think the regulator is a little surprised at how quickly this marketplace has grown," Mr Kingsley said.
"So I think you'll see more guidance and regulatory updates form ASIC and the Australian Tax Office (ATO) in this space as it becomes more and more popular for people who want to take control of their future in regards to their retirement plan."
While PIPA have welcomed the heighted awareness of property spruiking, the association said it will continue to lobby the government to increase regulation in the industry.
Mr Kingsley also said that PIPA would be seeking information on whether property investment advisers can work in partnership with financial planners and accountants to make recommendations on asset selection without an Australian financial services licence.
"We'll be seeking some further clarification from ASIC for our members in regards to the actual property selection and the commentary around asset selection," Mr Kingsley said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Sep 2017Lost and unclaimed super climbs to $18 billionBy Lara Bullock
- 21 Sep 2017ATO to release further guidance on reservesBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says report
Male SMSF members tend to hold a greater share of assets in higher risk investments including domestic shares and property in comparison to ...read more
- Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributions
SMSF trustees planning to make downsizer contributions have been warned that if a property has been subject to a partial sale in the 10 yea...read more
- ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requireme...read more
- view all