Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Investing after divorce: Who gets the mine and who gets the shaft?

Investing after divorce: Who gets the mine and who gets the shaft?

Robert Hay, Cashwerkz
06 November 2018 — 3 minute read

Promoted by Cashwerkz.

It ain’t what you don’t know that gets you into trouble. It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so. – Mark Twain

Divorce is expensive. For many it is also unexpected, drawn out and uncertain. In almost all cases, it involves the sale and division of assets – wealth jointly accumulated as part of a shared financial plan.

Research analysed by the Australian Institute of Family Studies shows that the most common financial assets to be sold or split in the event of divorce are cash (~81%), residential property (~77%) and superannuation (~81%).1 Investments (~22%) and businesses / farms (~24%) were also represented in the data and most likely involve either higher net worth couples 2 or those who separated later in life.

Where a matrimonial asset pool involving multiple assets has to be sold down there can be no guarantee that sale proceeds will be realised in either a timely or proximate fashion. The consequence – monies received from one sale may need to be kept in cash until all other sales are completed and a final agreement on their division is reached. Often, the receipt of a cash divorce settlement can be almost as overwhelming as the divorce itself - particularly where the client is not used to managing money and making financial decisions.

Indeed, rebuilding an asset base may take quite some time and may, for those still working, be harder to achieve with potentially half the income that used to be coming in. Moreover, from an emotional perspective, the process of risk profiling clients who are going through or who have just been through a divorce and associated property settlement will be a delicate one – balancing the practicalities of adjusting to a ‘new normal’ against the emotional impulses and well intentioned (albeit potentially misguided) advice from friends and family is not easy and will take time.

So what are the implications from a portfolio construction perspective and how could one make best use of the cash?

Whilst there is no “one size fits all” solution, being back on the market for the first time in many years (for investments of course!) means that there is a strong case for taking your time, looking around and keeping your options open. Bonus points for those who can do all of this whilst reducing the amount of complexity in their lives along the way.

Because if nothing else, you don’t want to go from the fry pan back into the fire.

Yet this is what many people do when it comes to managing their portfolios, particularly as it relates to cash. It is estimated that Australian investors lose nearly ~$4 billion in interest every year and, as recent industry surveys have shown, some investors are even getting negative post fee returns on their cash!

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

According to Rob Hay, Head of Advised Distribution at Cashwerkz, “many private wealth firms are beginning to take a proactive approach to term deposit investing, leveraging technology to provide a genuine holistic advice proposition to their clients that seeks to redress the traditional pain points when placing term deposits”.

Clearly, with interest rate spreads of up to ~80bps for term deposit rates of twelve months or less, and with the ability to securely transact for a client in as little as three clicks of a mouse, there are definite benefits up for grabs, for both Advisers and their clients.

“In a best interest environment, an Adviser’s duty to take a wider look across the term deposit market and secure competitive rates for their clients is first and foremost. When viewed in the context of the ongoing presence of the Federal Government’s deposit guarantee combined with the application of innovative technology solutions there has never been a better time to open up the market for term deposits in a similar way to how traditional platforms expanded choice in managed investment schemes” concludes Hay.

So when dealing with clients who have gone through, or are going through, a material life event such as divorce, it can pay to think outside the box and look for ways to use technology in order to deliver better client outcomes for the cash component of their portfolio – giving them a better chance to rebuild their wealth greater confidence and less complexity.

 

1 https://aifs.gov.au/publications/division-matrimonial-property-australia/export table 1.1
2 https://aifs.gov.au/publications/division-matrimonial-property-australia/export table 1.2

 

Investing after divorce: Who gets the mine and who gets the shaft?
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do you think the government should reinstate the accountants’ exemption for SMSF advice?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super