subscribe to our newsletter
SMSF admin: unfinished business?

SMSF admin: unfinished business?

Aleks Vickovich
31 March 2014

With the institutions moving heavily into SMSF administration, Aleks Vickovich questions whether it is time to revisit the regulation debate and finish what the Cooper Review started

‘VERTICAL INTEGRATION’ is actually a buzz word in financial planning circles, and has been for some time.

Untouched by the FOFA reforms and a common bug bear of independent financial advisers, the term is used more broadly to refer to the practice of cross-subsidisation within large ‘vertically integrated’ financial institutions, resulting in incentives to recommend in-house products or in some way benefit the parent company’s bottom line.

Some in the financial advice industry believe it is a gross form of conflicted remuneration, others think it is simply good business. What is clear is that the issue, while largely dormant throughout the FOFA consultation process, is gaining traction as a matter of concern among policymakers and their regulatory agents.

In November 2013, at a conference of independent financial advisers in Tasmania, Senator Arthur Sinodinos put the issue firmly on the agenda, suggesting the government is keen to review vertical integration in the financial services industry and any conflicts of interest that may arise from the structure.

READ the full story in the latest issue of SMSF Adviser magazine – OUT NOW

Click here to subscribe to SMSF Adviser magazine.

SMSF admin: unfinished business?
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What do you plan to do in response to the new adviser education standards?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super