X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Podcasts
  • Events
    • SMSF Technical Strategy Day
    • AI Summit
    • SMSF Awards
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Podcasts
  • Events
    • SMSF Technical Strategy Day
    • AI Summit
    • SMSF Awards
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

SMSF trustees immune to vertical integration

Conflicts of interest stemming from vertically-integrated business models are less likely to negatively impact SMSF trustees than other investor profiles, according to two industry commentators.

by Aleks Vickovich
May 8, 2014
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read

The SMSF Academy’s Aaron Dunn told SMSF Adviser that the movement of the larger financial institutions into the SMSF market stems from a strategic desire to “stem the leakage [from rival superannuation segments] or to leverage other products and channels”.

“They are all looking at the opportunities for vertical integration,” Mr Dunn said.

X

However, while the corporate strategy of vertical integration may lead to conflicts of interest or even product bias among some advice professionals – as suggested by SPAA in its submission to the Financial System Inquiry – Mr Dunn suggested that SMSF trustees may not be as susceptible to these potential biases as other advice clients.

“Trustees are very engaged, very informed, they read the news and understand our industry,” Mr Dunn said, adding that the debate over vertical integration is likely to “play out a little differently” in the SMSF space.

Andrew Varlamos, commercial director of SMSF platform and admin provider Praemium, concurred with Mr Dunn’s sentiments, telling SMSF Adviser that “it is certainly the case that SMSF trustees have a very independent [mindset]”.

“You can have a very interesting discussion about advice, investment managers and platforms, but you can’t directly replicate that discussion [of vertical integration] in the SMSF administration market,” Mr Varlamos said.

The comments follow AMP’s rejection of claims that SMSF administration tools serve a restrictive purpose. 

Tags: News

Related Posts

Images: Duncan Andison/adobe.stock.com

Change in definition of an SMSF passes virtually unnoticed

by Keeli Cambourne
July 22, 2026

In a recent technical update, Figot said from July 1, the definition of SMSF changed in the Treasury Laws Amendment...

Image: Yurii Kibalnik/stock.adobe.com

Death of a member and control of fund remains challenging issue

by Keeli Cambourne
July 22, 2026

In a recent webinar for Super Guardian, Miller said the death of a member is an area which always needs...

Australian Taxation Office

Avoid common SMSF annual return errors before you submit

by Keeli Cambourne
July 22, 2026

The tax office said that each year, a number of common issues arise in self-managed super fund annual returns (SARs)...

Comments 2

  1. @SMSFCoach says:
    12 years ago

    I agree with Aaron. With the ability to use Direct shares,LICs, ETF’s and the coming mFund services as well as TD’s and High Interest Cash Accounts most SMSF do not have to consider platforms at all and can seek the best provider for each service. Just look at the Australian Money Market Term Deposit Facility which means Advisors to SMSF Trustees can move funds around 20+ institutions to get the best rates and terms with the tick of a box.

    Reply
  2. Fergus Hardingham says:
    12 years ago

    My response to this is:

    Dixon Advisory [a vertically integrated model if ever there was one]

    Noting that also with the banks getting into SMSF solutions (and they won’t get into the business if they were not going to get clients / trustees on board).

    Which disproves Mr Dunn’s view.

    The reality is that SMSF trustees are like any other client and while some may have more of a independent mind set. It won’t stop them buy bank products and solutions.

    Fergus Hardingham (Independent Adviser]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Podcasts
  • Events
    • SMSF Technical Strategy Day
    • AI Summit
    • SMSF Awards
    • Australian Wealth Management Awards
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited