One industry lawyer has said that using digital signatures to execute trust deeds in some of the eastern states does not comply with the law and could render the super fund non-complying.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Townsends Business and Corporate Lawyers principal Peter Townsend said research from the law firm indicates that in NSW, Victoria and Queensland it is not possible to digitally sign a deed in purely electronic format, and that it must be done in hard copy.
“Those people who have been offered or have taken up an offer to set up their super fund uber quickly because they’ve signed it online, will find that their document is invalid,” said Mr Townsend.
If a deed is found to be invalid, then the court could take the view that there is an “oral trust” in place, Mr Townsend explained.
“If the deed they signed is invalid, there is just an oral trust; it’s a real trust but it’s not necessarily on the terms of trust deed, and almost certainly wouldn’t comply with the SIS Act.”
There would be very substantial taxation issues arising from this, he warned, because the fund would not meet the requirements to get the tax concessions.
Mr Townsend said the legislation around documents and signatures might be something that the government needs to examine, and that the regulator needs to look at and review in the meantime.
“Now, unfortunately, the laws that I’m talking about are state laws, so they’ll need to be amended in Victoria, NSW and Queensland.”
There is also a chance that the trustees signing these trust deeds electronically could take legal action against the provider of the trust deed, if they face significant taxation consequences.
“I would think where this has been offered, there’s been a representation that the fund deed will be compliant with the SIS Act, and that representation [might be] proven to be inaccurate,” Mr Townsend said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
25 Oct 2016Property spruiker activity on the rise, adviser warnsBy Miranda Brownlee
25 Oct 2016Govt urged to clarify ‘structured settlement amounts’By Staff Reporter
24 Oct 2016Compliance risks flagged with LRBA bank documentsBy Miranda Brownlee
24 Oct 2016Evolv announces new SMSF audit offeringsBy Staff Reporter
21 Oct 2016Super funds accused of fee delaying member transitionsBy Staff Reporter
21 Oct 2016ASIC spot checks, shadow shopping imminentBy Katarina Taurian
- view all
Property spruiker activity on the rise, adviser warns
The number of property spruikers preying on SMSF trustees and practitioners has increased in the past year, with spruikers attempting to ent...read more
Govt urged to clarify ‘structured settlement amounts’
A trustee lobby group has called on the government to provide a more precise definition of ‘structured settlement amounts’ within the pr...read more
- view all