Applying an active asset reduction in some situations may not be as tax-effective as a retirement exemption and should be carefully thought through by practitioners, says one industry expert.
While applying the active asset reduction can mean another 50 per cent discount off capital gains tax after the general discount, if the asset is in a superannuation fund, there may be other more effective exemptions or reductions that can be applied, Cooper and Co.'s director, Gordon Cooper, explained at the SMSF Association conference.
“You need to think about whether you want to claim the active asset reduction,” said Mr Cooper.
“If you do claim it, you reduce the gain to 25 per cent. If the 25 per cent is less than the retirement exemption, you may be better off not claiming the active asset reduction so that you can get more money into a superannuation fund.”
It is also important to remember that while a share in a company title can be an active asset for CGT purposes, under the SIS regulations, the trustee must be a significant individual of that company.
“So the company title of the property would have to account for 20 per cent or more of the interest,” he said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
26 Jul 2016Super proposals ‘a leaking sieve’, says lawyerBy Miranda Brownlee
26 Jul 2016Investors urged to consider alternatives to superBy Jack Derwin
26 Jul 2016Consultant calls super cap hype ‘codswallop’By Adrian Flores
22 Jul 2016Accounting bodies rated in new ethics researchBy Katarina Taurian
22 Jul 2016Internal backlash to super proposals continuesBy Miranda Brownlee
22 Jul 2016Big four firm tips further exemptions for super proposalBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all