For accountants willing to take on some extra work – and risk – it may be more beneficial to look at a full AFSL or authorisation under a full licence, given the limitations of the limited licence, one industry lawyer has warned.
Jaime Lumsden Kelly of The Fold Legal told SMSF Adviser that the various restrictions of the limited licence prevent accountants from being able to provide a full service to their clients.
“They have to bring in other financial planners and life insurance experts to be able to provide full services for clients so for accountants who want to be able to retain that control themselves, there’s a lot of value in it,” she said.
The main hurdle for accountants who might want to go down this path remains the three-year experience requirement, given there are no transitional arrangements for the full licence, she said.
Accountants would therefore need to provide financial planning under another full ASFL before applying for their own.
Bluepoint Consulting adviser Tony Bates agrees that it may be worthwhile for accountants to look at the full AFSL or authorisation under a full licence since he considers the limited licence to be the least appealing option for them.
“[It] adds a whole lot of new compliance, new costs, new risks, new supervision for doing what they have always been able to do,” he argues.
“I can understand their frustration because they are not really going to be able to pass these costs and liabilities to their clients.”
Limited licences, under which accountants are limited to discussing advice on establishing an SMSF, contributing to it and commencing pensions, may leave “accountants stranded”, he warned.
“I just think that you might be better off going for the full licence; [otherwise], it’s a lot of headache, a lot of compliance, a lot of risk, for no new benefit," Mr Bates said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
23 Sep 2016Accountants losing out to online SMSF service providersBy Katarina Taurian
23 Sep 2016SMSF establishments see steady increaseBy Staff Reporter
23 Sep 2016Reversionary pensions predicted to escape $1.6m transfer capBy Miranda Brownlee
22 Sep 2016Government considers national default for super schemeBy Jack Derwin
22 Sep 2016ATO hints at new service for auditorsBy Katarina Taurian
22 Sep 2016‘Costly’ and common LRBA mistakes flaggedBy Katarina Taurian
- view all
Accountants losing out to online SMSF service providers
Accountants are being urged to show trustees that they can add value beyond basic administrative functions, as research indicates online se...read more
Reversionary pensions predicted to escape $1.6m transfer cap
SMSF practitioners may want to consider changing death benefit nominations to reversionary pensions for their clients’ estate planning, am...read more
Government considers national default for super scheme
The federal government is considering the idea of having super funds compete to be the national default provider as part of a measure to cut...read more
- view all