Ahead of the 30 June deadline, the ATO is “very concerned” that SMSF trustees are not meeting or aware of certain conditions that would qualify their related-party loan as being on commercial terms, according to one industry lawyer.
In late 2014, the ATO released two interpretative decisions which indicate that borrowings on non-commercial terms can cause non-arm’s length income.
SMSF trustees are expected to have these arrangements on commercial terms by 30 June 2016, the ATO announced in late October last year.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers partner Scott Hay-Bartlem said some SMSF trustees have been overly fixated on getting the loan’s interest rate on commercial terms, and ignoring other key details.
“In our experience, it’s not just the market interest rate the ATO is concerned about, but also things like the security that has been taken – is it the same sort of security that an arm’s-length bank would take?” he said.
“And the principal payments, are they the sort of principal payments that an arm’s-length lender would require?”
Putting loan agreements in place is also essential, Mr Hay-Bartlem said.
“I’ve never had the bank not want the loan agreement, and people don’t often put the effort in of getting documents done. So if you haven’t got a written loan agreement, the bank wouldn’t lend to you. Also, how can you establish what the terms are?” he said.
Mr Hay-Bartlem also stressed the importance of registering a mortgage, as would be done with a bank.
“The ATO has given us a time period to get this fixed. So everyone should be looking at their related-party LRBA loans and making sure it’s not just the interest rate that is right, but that all the terms are met,” he said.
Shirley Schaefer, superannuation partner with accounting and advisory network BDO, also noted the ATO is likely to be keeping a close eye on whether these loan structures are compliant.
“Once the 2016 returns start being lodged, they might start data filtering on the LRBA information and doing some data analytics around loan and interest rates at the very least,” she told SMSF Adviser.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
25 Oct 2016Property spruiker activity on the rise, adviser warnsBy Miranda Brownlee
25 Oct 2016Govt urged to clarify ‘structured settlement amounts’By Staff Reporter
24 Oct 2016Compliance risks flagged with LRBA bank documentsBy Miranda Brownlee
24 Oct 2016Evolv announces new SMSF audit offeringsBy Staff Reporter
21 Oct 2016Super funds accused of fee delaying member transitionsBy Staff Reporter
21 Oct 2016ASIC spot checks, shadow shopping imminentBy Katarina Taurian
- view all
Property spruiker activity on the rise, adviser warns
The number of property spruikers preying on SMSF trustees and practitioners has increased in the past year, with spruikers attempting to ent...read more
Govt urged to clarify ‘structured settlement amounts’
A trustee lobby group has called on the government to provide a more precise definition of ‘structured settlement amounts’ within the pr...read more
- view all