Financial advisers and accountants who provide certificates for LRBAs could be breaching the National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009, according to one industry lawyer.
SMSF clients seeking to enter an LRBA frequently ask their adviser or accountant to complete a certificate from the lender in order to confirm they have advised the client about the terms, suitability and risks of the loan, said senior lawyer at The Fold Legal, Lesley Thorne.
These practitioners could potentially be giving credit advice, for which they may not be insured, she said.
“Unless the adviser or accountant holds an Australian Credit Licence or is a Credit Representative of a licensee, it is an offence to provide ‘credit assistance’ or ‘act as an intermediary’ in relation to consumer credit,” Ms Thorne said.
“This means that if the client’s loan is consumer credit and the adviser or accountant isn’t licensed or authorised, they can only provide the client and their lender with factual information.”
Where the trustees of an SMSF are individuals, an LRBA will be consumer credit if it is to purchase, renovate or improve residential property for investment purposes, Ms Thorne explained.
“Because the objective of an SMSF is to provide retirement funds for members, a property purchase or renovation by the SMSF will always be for investment purposes,” she said.
“This means that a loan provided to SMSF trustees who are individuals intending to purchase/renovate property will be consumer credit.”
Where a loan is to purchase a different type of asset or the SMSF has a corporate trustee it won’t be considered consumer credit, she added.
“Advisers and accountants still need to be wary in this area though [since] providing advice on the loan or a certificate to the lender could still overstep their professional boundaries, leaving them vulnerable to claims by a client or a lender that aren’t covered by their professional indemnity insurance,” Ms Thorne said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
22 Jul 2016Accounting bodies rated in new ethics researchBy Katarina Taurian
22 Jul 2016Internal backlash to super proposals continuesBy Miranda Brownlee
22 Jul 2016Big four firm tips further exemptions for super proposalBy Miranda Brownlee
21 Jul 2016Crowe Horwath flags compliance traps with unit trustsBy Miranda Brownlee
21 Jul 2016SMSFA welcomes reappointment of Morrison and O’DwyerBy Jack Derwin
21 Jul 2016Rice Warner challenges super proposals criticismBy Staff Reporter
- view all
Big four firm tips further exemptions for super proposal
One of the big four accounting firms has predicted that, in addition to divorce and personal injury settlements, certain international trans...read more
Crowe Horwath flags compliance traps with unit trusts
A lack of understanding regarding related investments and unit trusts among both accountants and trustees is leading to a range of complianc...read more
- view all